WHO Arbovirus guideline: minimally important difference survey
WHO is seeking to refine our understanding of minimally important differences (MID) for arbovirus, particularly two outcomes: 1) major bleeding and 2) organ failure. Minimally important differences are the smallest changes in outcomes or measurements that are considered significant enough by patients to indicate a noticeable improvement or worsening of a condition.
Participants
| WHO Arbovirus guideline – Minimally Important Difference survey1 | ||||
| 18 responses from 19 participants invited.1 | ||||
| First name | Last name | Completed | Date submitted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 As of 17 Apr 2024 | ||||
Results
Major bleeding
Organ failure
Table overview
Major bleeding
| WHO Clinical Management of Arbovirus guideline - Minimally Important Difference survey | |||
| Major Bleeding - As of 17 Apr 20241 | |||
| Responses | Total responses | n | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 1 per 1000 (i.e. 0.1%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 5 per 1000 (i.e. 0.5%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 10 per 1000 (i.e. 1%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 20 per 1000 (i.e. 2%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 30 per 1000 (i.e. 3%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 40 per 1000 (i.e. 4%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 50 per 1000 (i.e. 5%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 100 per 1000 (i.e. 10%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 150 per 1000 (i.e. 15%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in major bleeding of 200 per 1000 (i.e. 20%) important? (n=18) | |||
| 1 Results from 18 participants who completed the survey | |||
You can download all responses here:
Organ failure
| WHO Clinical Management of Arbovirus guideline - Minimally Important Difference survey | |||
| Organ failure - As of 17 Apr 20241 | |||
| Responses | Total responses | n | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 1 per 1000 (i.e. 0.1%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 5 per 1000 (i.e. 0.5%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 10 per 1000 (i.e. 1%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 20 per 1000 (i.e. 2%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 30 per 1000 (i.e. 3%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 40 per 1000 (i.e. 4%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 50 per 1000 (i.e. 5%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 100 per 1000 (i.e. 10%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 150 per 1000 (i.e. 15%) important? (n=18) | |||
| What percentage of people would consider a reduction in organ failure of 200 per 1000 (i.e. 20%) important? (n=18) | |||
| 1 Results from 18 participants who completed the survey | |||
You can download all responses here: